The Merge Aftermath: 3 Unexpected Consequences of Ethereum’s Energy Overhaul

Introduction

On September 15, 2022, Ethereum completed The Merge—one of the most significant upgrades in blockchain history. This monumental shift transitioned Ethereum from energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) to eco-friendly Proof-of-Stake (PoS), fundamentally altering its security model, economics, and future scalability.

This 2000+ word deep dive explores:
What The Merge was and why it mattered
Technical mechanics of the PoW → PoS transition
Immediate and long-term impacts
Challenges and criticisms
What’s next for Ethereum

By the end, you’ll understand why The Merge was a watershed moment for crypto—and how it sets the stage for Ethereum’s future.


1. Why Ethereum Needed The Merge

The Problems with Proof-of-Work

  1. Energy Consumption
  • Ethereum PoW used ~112 TWh/year (equal to the Netherlands)
  • 99.95% reduction post-Merge
  1. Centralization Risks
  • Mining pools controlled >50% of hash power
  • ASIC miners dominated, squeezing out small participants
  1. Economic Limitations
  • High inflation (~4% annually via block rewards)
  • Miner extractable value (MEV) exploits

The Promise of Proof-of-Stake

Energy efficiency (99.95% less power)
Better decentralization (Anyone can stake 32 ETH)
Economic security (Attackers must own ETH to attack)
Scalability foundation (Paves way for sharding)


2. How The Merge Worked: A Technical Breakdown

Key Components

  1. Original Ethereum (PoW): Mainnet execution layer
  2. Beacon Chain (PoS): Launched Dec 2020 as consensus layer
  3. The Merge: Execution layer “merged” with Beacon Chain

Step-by-Step Transition

  1. Bellatrix Upgrade (Sept 6, 2022): Beacon Chain prepared for Merge
  2. Paris Upgrade (Sept 15, 2022): Final PoW block mined at TeraHash 58750000000000000000000
  3. Consensus Switch: New blocks validated by stakers, not miners

No:

  • New tokens created
  • Changes to gas fees
  • Interruptions to transactions

3. Immediate Impacts of The Merge

1. Energy Usage Plummeted

  • From 112 TWh/year0.01 TWh/year
  • Equivalent to turning off Chile’s national power grid

2. ETH Supply Dynamics Changed

MetricPre-MergePost-Merge
New ETH Issued~13,000/day~1,600/day
Inflation Rate~4%~0.5%
Burn RateNone~2,800/day (EIP-1559)

Result: ETH became deflationary when network activity is high.

3. Staking Rewards Shifted

  • Miners → Stakers now earn:
  • Block rewards (~4% APY)
  • Transaction fees (~1-2% APY)
  • MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) (~1-3% APY)

Total staking yield: ~5-9% annually


4. Long-Term Implications

1. Scalability Roadmap

The Merge was Phase 1 of Ethereum’s 5-phase plan:

  1. The Merge (PoS) ✅
  2. Surge (Sharding → 100,000 TPS)
  3. Verge (Stateless clients)
  4. Purge (History expiration)
  5. Splurge (Misc optimizations)

2. Institutional Staking Growth

  • Liquid staking tokens (LSTs): Lido, Rocket Pool
  • CEX staking: Coinbase, Kraken
  • Corporate participation: Bitcoin Suisse, Figment

3. Regulatory Clarity

  • SEC argues staking services = securities
  • Ethereum’s decentralization may help avoid security classification

5. Challenges & Criticisms

1. Centralization Concerns

  • Lido controls ~32% of staked ETH
  • Coinbase + Kraken = ~15%
  • Risk: Potential censorship (OFAC-compliant blocks)

2. Withdrawal Limitations

  • Initial post-Merge lockup until Shanghai upgrade (April 2023)
  • Still no instant withdrawals (4+ day queue)

3. Miner Backlash

  • ETC Hashrate surged as miners migrated
  • Minor ETHPoW fork (worth <1% of ETH value)

6. What’s Next for Ethereum?

1. The Surge (Danksharding)

  • Expected 2024-2025
  • Proto-danksharding (EIP-4844) first step

2. Staking Evolution

  • Decentralized staking pools
  • Zero-knowledge proofs for trustless validation

3. Layer 2 Integration

  • Rollups will process 90%+ transactions
  • Ethereum L1 becomes settlement + security layer

7. Conclusion: A New Era for Ethereum

The Merge succeeded in:
Reducing energy use by 99.95%
Making ETH deflationary
Laying groundwork for scalability

Remaining Challenges:
❌ Staking centralization
❌ Regulatory uncertainty

Final Thought:
“The Merge wasn’t an endpoint—it was the foundation for Ethereum’s next decade.”


FAQs

Q: Could The Merge have failed?
A: Yes—but 3+ years of testing minimized risks.

Q: Did ETH price pump after The Merge?
A: No—it dropped 20% short-term due to “sell the news.”

Q: Can Ethereum revert to PoW?
A: Technically yes, but community consensus makes it unlikely.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

weborias work
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.